Dagstuhl Seminar 16161 Natural Language Argumentation : Mining , Processing , and Reasoning over Textual Arguments
نویسندگان
چکیده
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 16161 “Natural Language Argumentation: Mining, Processing, and Reasoning over Textual Arguments”, 17–22 April 2016. The seminar brought together leading researchers from computational linguistics, argumentation theory and cognitive psychology communities to discuss the obtained results and the future challenges of the recently born Argument Mining research area. 40 participants from 14 different countries took part in 7 sessions that included 30 talks, two tutorials, and a hands-on “unshared” task. Seminar April 17–22, 2016 – http://www.dagstuhl.de/16161 1998 ACM Subject Classification I.2.4 Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods, I.2.7 Natural Language Processing
منابع مشابه
Detecting Bipolar Semantic Relations among Natural Language Arguments with Textual Entailment: a Study
In the knowledge representation and reasoning research area, argumentation theory aims at representing and reasoning over information items called arguments. In everyday life, arguments are reasons to believe and reasons to act, and they are usually expressed in natural language. Even if ad-hoc natural language examples are often provided in argumentation theory works, no automated processing o...
متن کاملComputational Humanities - bridging the gap between Computer Science and Digital Humanities (Dagstuhl Seminar 14301)
Research in the field of Digital Humanities, also known as Humanities Computing, has seen a steady increase over the past years. Situated at the intersection of computing science and the humanities, present efforts focus on making resources such as texts, images, musical pieces and other semiotic artifacts digitally available, searchable and analysable. To this end, computational tools enabling...
متن کاملNoDE: A Benchmark of Natural Language Arguments
In the latest years, natural models of argumentation and argument mining are becoming more and more important topics in the argumentation community. Given this tendency, there is the need to produce standard datasets on which natural language approaches to argumentation can be evaluated. In this paper, we present NoDE, a benchmark of natural language arguments composed of three datasets, built ...
متن کاملTowards a Benchmark of Natural Language Arguments
The connections among natural language processing and argumentation theory are becoming stronger in the latest years, with a growing amount of works going in this direction, in different scenarios and applying heterogeneous techniques. In this paper, we present two datasets we built to cope with the combination of the Textual Entailment framework and bipolar abstract argumentation. In our appro...
متن کاملComputational Models of Language Meaning in Context
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 13462 “Computational Models of Language Meaning in Context”. The seminar addresses one of the most significant issues to arise in contemporary formal and computational models of language and inference: that of the role and expressiveness of distributional models of semantics and statistically derived models of language and l...
متن کامل